<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Learning Environments and Social Creativity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://loisholzman.org/2010/05/online-learning-environments-and-social-creativity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://loisholzman.org/2010/05/online-learning-environments-and-social-creativity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 19:40:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen Lowenheim</title>
		<link>http://loisholzman.org/2010/05/online-learning-environments-and-social-creativity/comment-page-1/#comment-4854</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen Lowenheim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 13:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://loisholzman.org/?p=573#comment-4854</guid>
		<description>Thank you, Lois.  You&#039;ve helped me relate to things I&#039;ve found challenging about on-line teaching as opportunities for social creativity.  In the class I&#039;m teaching on everyday creativity, I love being able to re-read posts and get a sense of the group.  And participants have been open about their lives in a way that helps the group delve into intellectually challenging material - now that you pointed that out I can see the many ways it&#039;s going on.  Yet the possibility that some posts have been un-responded to &quot;looms large&quot; for me, as I go back and read them.  As an online &quot;newbie&quot; It raises interesting questions for me about the group and the individual, time (since we can go &#039;back&#039; and read) and seeing posts as &#039;part of the process by which the  conversation has been created.&#039;  Hmmm...having this conversation on your blog seems to make these concerns loom less-large!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you, Lois.  You&#8217;ve helped me relate to things I&#8217;ve found challenging about on-line teaching as opportunities for social creativity.  In the class I&#8217;m teaching on everyday creativity, I love being able to re-read posts and get a sense of the group.  And participants have been open about their lives in a way that helps the group delve into intellectually challenging material &#8211; now that you pointed that out I can see the many ways it&#8217;s going on.  Yet the possibility that some posts have been un-responded to &#8220;looms large&#8221; for me, as I go back and read them.  As an online &#8220;newbie&#8221; It raises interesting questions for me about the group and the individual, time (since we can go &#8216;back&#8217; and read) and seeing posts as &#8216;part of the process by which the  conversation has been created.&#8217;  Hmmm&#8230;having this conversation on your blog seems to make these concerns loom less-large!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

